On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Pete Muir <[email protected]> wrote: > On 10 March 2016 at 13:40, Dusty Mabe <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > On 03/10/2016 01:14 PM, Carl Trieloff wrote: > >> > >> I saw Pradeepto's write-up on Helm/DM, using Nulecule for the 'bundle' > format with AtomicApp with Helm/DM - does that not mostly complete the > picture? > > > > What exactly do you mean by 'bundle' format? Do you mean the way we > > are packaging things up and delivering them via a Docker image in the > > registry? > > > > If you could expand on your statement that would be helpful. > > I'm guessing that by "bundle format" Carl means the nulecule > descriptor of the composition of the multi-container app. >
Nulecule has some advantages in that it's no so kubernetes-centric. For example, "spec" isn't a very meaningful term. On the flip side I like the way helm identifies dependencies; that would be good to integrate into nulecule. > > If so, I think the idea is that we use Nulecule as the descriptor > format, and Helm/DM as the package manager. > > They've developed their own packaging format complete with a provenance file and transport conventions. Hmm... does the world really need another packaging mechanism? We could introduce and extend helm to packaging metadata as a container. We know something about that. :) > Charts seems to be what Helm/DM is targeting here. Is this somewhere > to get involved? > > https://github.com/kubernetes/deployment-manager/blob/release-v1.2.1/docs/design/chart_format.md > > > > > Dusty > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Container-tools mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/container-tools > > _______________________________________________ > Container-tools mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/container-tools >
_______________________________________________ Container-tools mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/container-tools
