On 03/17/2017 11:57 AM, Ben Breard wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 9:52 AM, Lance Ball <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Thanks for the reply Ben. Adding everyone else back in... > > I honestly don't mean to be obtuse here, but I'm still a little confused. > Please bear with me and a couple more questions. > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 7:40 PM Ben Breard <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > I mean that fedora and centos will have versions of the rhel7-atomic > image. With this we can potentially create smaller s2i and other useful > things. ...but I have no other insight on who maintains what. sorry > > > I don't understand how Fedora and CentOS can have "versions of the > "rhel7-atomic" image. Do you mean that there will be "atomic" (and therefore > hopefully, smaller) images for these OSs? So, we'd have something like > fedora-atomic and centos-atomic? > > > rhel7-atomic is a base image built from Red Hat Enterprise Linux rpms. The > fedora & CentOS versions will be very similar, but composed from fedora & > centOS rpms. I have encouraged them to adopt the same naming scheme, but that > wasn't something that fedora was super excited about. I don't know where that > landed, and someone from Fedora would need to comment on where that's at. > > Looping in Dusty & KB to get more info on this.
Yes the Fedora version is made from Fedora rpms with an interest to make it as small as possible. It is hard to untie dependencies so that is a long process and we'll have to knock out small pieces over time. Dusty _______________________________________________ Container-tools mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/container-tools
