This has been a great conversation. Thanks everyone for your input. One thing that kind of got lost in the shuffle, though is this.
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 12:37 PM Lance Ball <[email protected]> wrote: > I also think that, in addition to the current OpenShift offerings for > Node.js on RHEL and CentOS, we should be providing a larger matrix of > options. Is there any reason not to pursue community versions of Node.js > builder images for the following combination of OS/Node? > > RHEL -> Node 4, 5, 6, 7 > rhel7-atomic -> Node 4, 5, 6, 7 > Fedora -> Node 4, 5, 6, 7 > CentOS -> Node 4, 5, 6, 7 > > I understand that SCL-provided, supported images for RHEL already exist > for Node.js v4.x and soon to be Node.js v6.x. As you probably know, some of > us are actively working towards a solution that would allow these supported > images to achieve greater turnaround time, and maintain version parity with > all current Node.js releases. > > Would the addition of community provided rhel7-atomic, fedora and perhaps > even rhel images be welcomed? > Anyone have feedback or concerns about this idea? Thanks Lance
_______________________________________________ Container-tools mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/container-tools
