> Thanks for the suggestions. I'm no expert in unicode, but I do agree > that such basic functionalities should be more easily available. > Maybe a `Ustring` module in containers would make sense (as a private > alias to `string`); most functionalities below would fit there
Is this for facilitation or implementation of UTF? There is an implementation here <https://opam.ocaml.org/packages/uutf/> -- SP _______________________________________________ Containers-users mailing list Containers-users@lists.ocaml.org http://lists.ocaml.org/listinfo/containers-users
