Le Fri, 23 Feb 2018, SP wrote: > > Thanks for the suggestions. I'm no expert in unicode, but I do agree > > that such basic functionalities should be more easily available. > > Maybe a `Ustring` module in containers would make sense (as a private > > alias to `string`); most functionalities below would fit there > > Is this for facilitation or implementation of UTF? > > There is an implementation here <https://opam.ocaml.org/packages/uutf/>
Yes, but we can avoid using it for the most basic facilities. It'd be nice to compare with in tests, though. -- Simon Cruanes http://weusepgp.info/ key 49AA62B6, fingerprint 949F EB87 8F06 59C6 D7D3 7D8D 4AC0 1D08 49AA 62B6
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Containers-users mailing list Containers-users@lists.ocaml.org http://lists.ocaml.org/listinfo/containers-users
