Le Fri, 23 Feb 2018, SP wrote:
> > Thanks for the suggestions. I'm no expert in unicode, but I do agree
> > that such basic functionalities should be more easily available.
> > Maybe a `Ustring` module in containers would make sense (as a private
> > alias to `string`); most functionalities below would fit there
> Is this for facilitation or implementation of UTF?
> There is an implementation here <https://opam.ocaml.org/packages/uutf/>

Yes, but we can avoid using it for the most basic facilities.
It'd be nice to compare with in tests, though.

Simon Cruanes

key 49AA62B6, fingerprint 949F EB87 8F06 59C6 D7D3  7D8D 4AC0 1D08 49AA 62B6

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Containers-users mailing list

Reply via email to