hehe, I am honored to be mentioned I would second brett's nomination of evenisse as chair, can't think of anyone that has given more to the project in the last couple of years :)
jesse On Jan 7, 2008 3:00 PM, Rahul Thakur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > And the nominations are..... > > (~opens the envelope~) > > 1) Brett Porter > > , and > > 2) Jesse McConnell > > Cheers :-) > Rahul > > > > Brett Porter wrote: > > of course :) > > > > On 07/01/2008, at 5:09 PM, Rahul Thakur wrote: > > > >> > >> Are more than one nominations allowed per person? > >> > >> Rahul > >> > >> Brett Porter wrote: > >>> So the poll for progressing seems in favour. > >>> > >>> Before we continue to vote on a proposal to send to the board, we > >>> need to decide on a description for the project, the initial > >>> PMC/committers, and a chair. > >>> > >>> I would like to nominate Emmanuel as the chair of the project. Are > >>> there any other nominations? > >>> > >>> I have the current committers list as: > >>> Maria Odea Ching > >>> Joakim Erdfelt > >>> Olivier Lamy > >>> Trygve Laugstol > >>> Jesse McConnell > >>> Brett Porter > >>> Edwin Punzalan > >>> Carlos Sanchez > >>> Wendy Smoak > >>> Rahul Thakur > >>> Emmanuel Venisse > >>> Kenney Westerhof > >>> Andrew Williams > >>> > >>> Anyone on that list that doesn't feel they should be a committer? > >>> Did I miss anyone? > >>> > >>> The following have committed only once, or have declared themselves > >>> emeritus: > >>> Herve Boutemy > >>> Dan Diephouse > >>> Fabrizio Giustina > >>> Arnaud Heritier > >>> Lukas Theussl > >>> Jason van Zyl > >>> > >>> Anyone on that list that would like to be included? > >>> > >>> Finally - I propose that the initial PMC be equal to the list of > >>> committers. Any objections or opinions about that? > >>> > >>> Cheers, > >>> Brett > >>> > >>> On 20/12/2007, at 5:42 PM, Brett Porter wrote: > >>> > >>>> So, what's next? > >>>> > >>>> This seems generally in favour - now might be a good time to get > >>>> started on it? > >>>> > >>>> From past experience the steps would be: > >>>> - poll the current maven committers to see who is interested in > >>>> participating in the TLP > >>>> - draft a resolution with those committers as the initial PMC > >>>> - vote on sending the resolution to the board > >>>> > >>>> The board next meets in mid-January. > >>>> > >>>> Any thoughts on moving forward with this? > >>>> > >>>> - Brett > >>>> > >>>> On 24/09/2007, at 6:59 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> On 9/21/07, Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> So I think it would be good for Continuum to become a Top Level > >>>>>> Project at ASF and the continuum community will have more chance > >>>>>> to grow. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> My concern for the moment is we don't have enough committer from > >>>>>> different companies, To be stable, at least 3 committers from > >>>>>> different companies would be good. > >>>>> > >>>>> It definitely feels like it's time for this to happen, or at least > to > >>>>> start the process. Assuming there is general agreement here, let's > >>>>> talk about it on [EMAIL PROTECTED] and see who else might be interested > >>>>> in > >>>>> joining us in a TLP. > >>>>> > >>>>> IMO, anyone who has access to the code now as part of Maven is > >>>>> welcome > >>>>> to come along when it moves out, or at any point in the future. > >>>>> That's how we handled the Tiles move (from Struts) and it worked > >>>>> well. > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Wendy > >>>> > >>> > >>> > > > > > > -- jesse mcconnell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
