Hello fellow odlparent & controller committers,

do you have any objection to merging
https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/54885/ ?

This would allow us to solve
https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8397, used e.g. in
https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/56672/, originally coming out of
investigating https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8355.

Tx,
M.

PS: A theoretical alternative to what I'm proposing would be to somehow
brute force ALL ODL Pax Exam tests to ALWAYS have a (new?) feature of
controller installed which includes the Blueprint extender bundle.
Personally I find that wrong, as to me that seems to break modularity; one
should not have to depend on controller e.g. in infrautils, or any other
bundle anywhere which wants to use BP but not ODL specific extensions (and
there are many like this), and we practically could not really cleanly make
odlparent's SFT Pax Exam hard depend on installing a controller feature
anyway.

PPS: I'll interpret no replies on this in 1 week from now as tacit "OK sure
go ahead" and self-merge c/54885 in 1 week. If you think it's a good idea
please do reply with at least a short "fine by me" so we can merge this
sooner!

--
Michael Vorburger, Red Hat
vorbur...@redhat.com | IRC: vorburger @freenode | ~ = http://vorburger.ch
_______________________________________________
controller-dev mailing list
controller-dev@lists.opendaylight.org
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/controller-dev

Reply via email to