On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 8:28 AM, Jozef Bacigál <jozef.baci...@pantheon.tech>
wrote:

> Thanks Michael, thanks for information. :)
>
>
>
> I do investigations further for the Illegal state bug.
>

Jozef, Abhijit, Anil: Have you seen
https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9038#c19 - great news -
thanks a lot, Sridhar and everyone involved!

So... will you merge https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/62674/6 ASAP,
cherry-pick it from stable/carbon to stable/nitrogen and master, and...
done!


> But at least we got some issue solved :)
>
>
>
> Jozef
>
>
>
> P.S.: Let you know if something new
>
>
>
> *From:* Michael Vorburger [mailto:vorbur...@redhat.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 7, 2017 3:07 PM
> *To:* Jozef Bacigál <jozef.baci...@pantheon.tech>; Anil Vishnoi <
> vishnoia...@gmail.com>; Vishnoi, Anil <avish...@brocade.com>
> *Cc:* Robert Varga <n...@hq.sk>; Tomáš Slušný <tomas.slu...@pantheon.tech>;
> Abhijit Kumbhare <abhijitk...@gmail.com>; openflowplugin-dev@lists.
> opendaylight.org; controller-dev@lists.opendaylight.org;
> mdsal-...@lists.opendaylight.org
> *Subject:* Re: [mdsal-dev] [openflowplugin-dev] Fwd: Bug 9038 -
> IllegalStateException: Attempted to close chain with outstanding
> transaction PingPongTransaction at org.opendaylight.
> openflowplugin.impl.device.TransactionChainManager.createTxChain
>
>
>
> All,
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 7:26 PM, Michael Vorburger <vorbur...@redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 4:34 PM, Michael Vorburger <vorbur...@redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 3:59 PM, Jozef Bacigál <jozef.baci...@pantheon.tech>
> wrote:
>
> HI Michael,
>
> are you able to test it on this patch [1] ? Or it needed to be merged ?
>
> Jozef - thanks a lot! I'll discuss with Daniel to understand how easy/hard
> it would be to get a carbon RPM with this, and let you know ASAP.
>
>
>
> Jozef, FYI we've just been able to get a new full ODL dist build + RPM
> incl. this (unmerge) change, and will re-run this through our scale test
> environment ASAP, and let you know how it looks.
>
>
>
> There is Good and Bad news - which one do you want first? ;-)
>
> The Good: I’m (very) happy to hereby confirm that on a re-test of a custom
> distribution of latest (yesterday's) carbon/stable together with c/62674/5
> (NB Patch Set 5; it’s still WIP) pulled in, we do not see
> https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9034 (OOM due to huge Map
> in ShardDataTree) anymore! This is great. NB: It may have been c/62674 or
> anything else that went in recently (anywhere incl. Bug 9028, dunno if that
> could have helped for this?) which did the trick, but it works now, so
> great! FYI this has been verified by both "wow, now it didn't blew up
> anymore with OOM" as well as confirmed via HPROF analysis through MAT
> (which now also revealed new Bug 9114; but that's another story). I'll
> therefore close blocker Bug 9034 as soon as you've agreed a final version
> of c/62674 and merged it (into carbon, nitrogen and master).
>
> The FYI: c/62674/5 does fix https://bugs.opendaylight.org/
> show_bug.cgi?id=9070, so I'll also close that after you merge.
>
>
>
> The Bad: The https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9038
> "IllegalStateException: Attempted to close chain with outstanding
> transaction PingPongTransaction" still appears in logs - sorry. So c/62674/5
> *DOES NOT* fix blocker Bug 9038. You can also find related information on
> the new attachment on umbrella https://bugs.opendaylight.org/
> show_bug.cgi?id=9096 re. other Tx leaks. I'm hoping this information is
> useful to openflowplug-dev to find another solution for Bug 9038.
>
>
> Tx,
>
> M.
>
> PS: Wrote about some blurb about the new tooling which came out of this on
> http://blog2.vorburger.ch/2017/09/how-to-find-transaction-related-memory.
> html
>
> --
>
> Michael Vorburger, Red Hat
> vorbur...@redhat.com | IRC: vorburger @freenode | ~ = http://vorburger.ch
>
_______________________________________________
controller-dev mailing list
controller-dev@lists.opendaylight.org
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/controller-dev

Reply via email to