In-line.

On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 7:24 AM, Michael Vorburger <vorbur...@redhat.com>
wrote:

> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 6:42 PM, Abhijit Kumbhare <abhijitk...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Michael! Looks like Luis is running test-openflowplugin-core on
>> the patch. Also I understand one of the 3 exceptions is fixed - there are
>> the other two exceptions still remaining. With one major exception fixed,
>> does this mean the priority can be reduced from blocker to critical?
>>
>
> Abhijit, IMHO we would be causing less confusion ;) if we closed 9038
> (after it's gone into master also, that was forgotten...) and then had 2
> separate new bugs for those other exceptions.
>

Sure - no problem.


>
> Sridhar, were you going to open those 2 other new bugs? It doesn't matter
> IMHO if you don't have the environment anymore to be able to provide more
> logs in the short term - at least have the issues, so that the openfllow
> plugin team can start pondering what to do about those, some time...
>
>
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 5:28 AM, Michael Vorburger <vorbur...@redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 8:28 AM, Jozef Bacigál <
>>> jozef.baci...@pantheon.tech> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks Michael, thanks for information. :)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I do investigations further for the Illegal state bug.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Jozef, Abhijit, Anil: Have you seen https://bugs.opendaylight.org/
>>> show_bug.cgi?id=9038#c19 - great news - thanks a lot, Sridhar and
>>> everyone involved!
>>>
>>> So... will you merge https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/62674/6
>>> ASAP, cherry-pick it from stable/carbon to stable/nitrogen and master,
>>> and... done!
>>>
>>>
>>>> But at least we got some issue solved :)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Jozef
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> P.S.: Let you know if something new
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From:* Michael Vorburger [mailto:vorbur...@redhat.com]
>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, September 7, 2017 3:07 PM
>>>> *To:* Jozef Bacigál <jozef.baci...@pantheon.tech>; Anil Vishnoi <
>>>> vishnoia...@gmail.com>; Vishnoi, Anil <avish...@brocade.com>
>>>> *Cc:* Robert Varga <n...@hq.sk>; Tomáš Slušný
>>>> <tomas.slu...@pantheon.tech>; Abhijit Kumbhare <abhijitk...@gmail.com>;
>>>> openflowplugin-...@lists.opendaylight.org;
>>>> controller-dev@lists.opendaylight.org; mdsal-...@lists.opendaylight.org
>>>> *Subject:* Re: [mdsal-dev] [openflowplugin-dev] Fwd: Bug 9038 -
>>>> IllegalStateException: Attempted to close chain with outstanding
>>>> transaction PingPongTransaction at org.opendaylight.openflowplugi
>>>> n.impl.device.TransactionChainManager.createTxChain
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> All,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 7:26 PM, Michael Vorburger <vorbur...@redhat.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 4:34 PM, Michael Vorburger <vorbur...@redhat.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 3:59 PM, Jozef Bacigál <
>>>> jozef.baci...@pantheon.tech> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> HI Michael,
>>>>
>>>> are you able to test it on this patch [1] ? Or it needed to be merged ?
>>>>
>>>> Jozef - thanks a lot! I'll discuss with Daniel to understand how
>>>> easy/hard it would be to get a carbon RPM with this, and let you know ASAP.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Jozef, FYI we've just been able to get a new full ODL dist build + RPM
>>>> incl. this (unmerge) change, and will re-run this through our scale test
>>>> environment ASAP, and let you know how it looks.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> There is Good and Bad news - which one do you want first? ;-)
>>>>
>>>> The Good: I’m (very) happy to hereby confirm that on a re-test of a
>>>> custom distribution of latest (yesterday's) carbon/stable together with
>>>> c/62674/5 (NB Patch Set 5; it’s still WIP) pulled in, we do not see
>>>> https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9034 (OOM due to huge
>>>> Map in ShardDataTree) anymore! This is great. NB: It may have been c/62674
>>>> or anything else that went in recently (anywhere incl. Bug 9028, dunno if
>>>> that could have helped for this?) which did the trick, but it works now, so
>>>> great! FYI this has been verified by both "wow, now it didn't blew up
>>>> anymore with OOM" as well as confirmed via HPROF analysis through MAT
>>>> (which now also revealed new Bug 9114; but that's another story). I'll
>>>> therefore close blocker Bug 9034 as soon as you've agreed a final version
>>>> of c/62674 and merged it (into carbon, nitrogen and master).
>>>>
>>>> The FYI: c/62674/5 does fix https://bugs.opendaylight.org/
>>>> show_bug.cgi?id=9070, so I'll also close that after you merge.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The Bad: The https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9038
>>>> "IllegalStateException: Attempted to close chain with outstanding
>>>> transaction PingPongTransaction" still appears in logs - sorry. So 
>>>> c/62674/5
>>>> *DOES NOT* fix blocker Bug 9038. You can also find related information
>>>> on the new attachment on umbrella https://bugs.opendaylight.org/
>>>> show_bug.cgi?id=9096 re. other Tx leaks. I'm hoping this information
>>>> is useful to openflowplug-dev to find another solution for Bug 9038.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Tx,
>>>>
>>>> M.
>>>>
>>>> PS: Wrote about some blurb about the new tooling which came out of this
>>>> on http://blog2.vorburger.ch/2017/09/how-to-find-transaction-re
>>>> lated-memory.html
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Michael Vorburger, Red Hat
>>>> vorbur...@redhat.com | IRC: vorburger @freenode | ~ =
>>>> http://vorburger.ch
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
controller-dev mailing list
controller-dev@lists.opendaylight.org
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/controller-dev

Reply via email to