On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 4:50 PM, Faseela K <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > *From:* Tom Pantelis [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Saturday, June 09, 2018 2:24 AM > *To:* Anil Vishnoi <[email protected]> > *Cc:* Faseela K <[email protected]>; Michael Vorburger < > [email protected]>; [email protected]; > controller-dev <[email protected]>; > [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [controller-dev] [infrautils-dev] OK to resurrect c/64522 > to first move infrautils.DiagStatus integration for datastore from genius > to controller, and then improve it for GENIUS-138 ? > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 3:11 PM, Anil Vishnoi <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 11:39 AM, Faseela K <[email protected]> wrote: > > Not related in this context, but if we can get shard leader change > notification, can we use that to derive an entity owner instead of using > EOS? ;) > > Humble suggestion, don't use shard location/ownership status in your > business logic ;-) > > > > > > +1. And knowledge, assumptions about shard names, member names ... :) > > > > >> Of course we all like to avoid such complex logics in the application > code. In a 3 node cluster, for an application like netvirt which has to > push a lot of flows, plus a set of OVSDB configuration, based on some > events coming from neutron datastores(note that all of these are different > config shards), I am just trying to understand what is the best way to > place things. It is always good not to make application logic, depend on > internals of infra, but is the only way then to collocate shards? > I have few questions around what lead to the solution that putting all the shard to one node is the only solutions , but i don't want to hi-jack this thread with that topic :). > > > > > Thanks, > > Faseela > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Tom Pantelis > *Sent:* Friday, June 08, 2018 12:07 AM > *To:* Michael Vorburger <[email protected]> > *Cc:* [email protected]; controller-dev < > [email protected]>; [email protected]; > Robert Varga <[email protected]> > *Subject:* Re: [infrautils-dev] [controller-dev] OK to resurrect c/64522 > to first move infrautils.DiagStatus integration for datastore from genius > to controller, and then improve it for GENIUS-138 ? > > > > -- Thanks Anil
_______________________________________________ controller-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/controller-dev
