On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 12:21 PM Robert Varga <n...@hq.sk> wrote: > On 27/07/18 11:29, Michael Vorburger wrote: > > Hello, Tom, Robert, Stephen, > > > > Does commiting a transaction with no put/.../merge/delete operations on > > that Tx have any noteworthy (real life) overhead compared to cancelling > it? > > > > At the very least it requires queueing, as it needs to be ordered among > transactions. Cancel is distinctly different. >
but if there are no operations, it could just shortcut to cancel, no? Would this perhaps be a worthwhile enhancement (for Neon obviously) in core MD SAL (instead of ManagedNewTransactionRunner) ? > Regards, > Robert > >
_______________________________________________ controller-dev mailing list controller-dev@lists.opendaylight.org https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/controller-dev
