On 27/07/18 13:33, Michael Vorburger wrote: > On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 12:21 PM Robert Varga <n...@hq.sk > <mailto:n...@hq.sk>> wrote: > > On 27/07/18 11:29, Michael Vorburger wrote: > > Hello, Tom, Robert, Stephen, > > > > Does commiting a transaction with no put/.../merge/delete > operations on > > that Tx have any noteworthy (real life) overhead compared to > cancelling it? > > > > At the very least it requires queueing, as it needs to be ordered among > transactions. Cancel is distinctly different. > > > but if there are no operations, it could just shortcut to cancel, no? > > Would this perhaps be a worthwhile enhancement (for Neon obviously) in > core MD SAL (instead of ManagedNewTransactionRunner) ?
They are different operations, their outcome is different, as is their interface contract. No, we should not be taking any shortcuts here. Bye, Robert
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ controller-dev mailing list controller-dev@lists.opendaylight.org https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/controller-dev
