Hello,

here are the minutes of the weekly Kernel Projects meeting from today:

(06:52:50 CET) odl_meetbot: Minutes:
http://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-meeting/2019/kernel_weekly/opendaylight-meeting-kernel_weekly.2019-01-22-17.06.html
(06:52:50 CET) odl_meetbot: Minutes (text):
http://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-meeting/2019/kernel_weekly/opendaylight-meeting-kernel_weekly.2019-01-22-17.06.txt
(06:52:50 CET) odl_meetbot: Log:
http://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-meeting/2019/kernel_weekly/opendaylight-meeting-kernel_weekly.2019-01-22-17.06.log.html

Tx,
M.

#opendaylight-meeting: kernel-weekly Meeting started by vorburger at
17:06:50 UTC (full logs
<https://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-meeting/2019/kernel_weekly/opendaylight-meeting-kernel_weekly.2019-01-22-17.06.log.html>
).

Meeting summary

   1. *NETCONF Test Tool removal* (vorburger
   
<https://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-meeting/2019/kernel_weekly/opendaylight-meeting-kernel_weekly.2019-01-22-17.06.log.html#l-5>,
   17:07:45)
      1. jmorvay asks if this tool can be removed (vorburger
      
<https://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-meeting/2019/kernel_weekly/opendaylight-meeting-kernel_weekly.2019-01-22-17.06.log.html#l-6>,
      17:07:57)
      2. jmorvay explains what this does.. testing tool is a NETCONF server
      which simulates like a switch or router (vorburger
      
<https://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-meeting/2019/kernel_weekly/opendaylight-meeting-kernel_weekly.2019-01-22-17.06.log.html#l-7>,
      17:09:02)
      3. it has an option when you start it to specific if you want to use
      the real MD-SAL data store or its local in-memory List (this is not the
      MD-SAL in-memory TestDataBroker) (vorburger
      
<https://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-meeting/2019/kernel_weekly/opendaylight-meeting-kernel_weekly.2019-01-22-17.06.log.html#l-10>,
      17:10:29)
      4. jmorvay propose to keep the md-sal backed one, but ditch that fake
      data store (vorburger
      
<https://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-meeting/2019/kernel_weekly/opendaylight-meeting-kernel_weekly.2019-01-22-17.06.log.html#l-11>,
      17:11:32)
      5. rovarga says that the fake data store is useful for performance
      testing netconf protocol (vorburger
      
<https://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-meeting/2019/kernel_weekly/opendaylight-meeting-kernel_weekly.2019-01-22-17.06.log.html#l-12>,
      17:12:26)
      6. vorburger suggests asking if using the MD-SAL in-memory
      TestDataBroker could be an option here; rovarga says no, because that's
      still too heavy (vorburger
      
<https://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-meeting/2019/kernel_weekly/opendaylight-meeting-kernel_weekly.2019-01-22-17.06.log.html#l-13>,
      17:14:20)
      7. jmorvay reason for wanting to remove it is maintenance burden,
      rovarga says not much maintenance is needed (vorburger
      
<https://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-meeting/2019/kernel_weekly/opendaylight-meeting-kernel_weekly.2019-01-22-17.06.log.html#l-14>,
      17:15:09)
      8. jmorvay reason was JAXB removal, rovarga says it's OK to keep it
      in the test tool (vorburger
      
<https://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-meeting/2019/kernel_weekly/opendaylight-meeting-kernel_weekly.2019-01-22-17.06.log.html#l-15>,
      17:16:18)
      9.
      
https://github.com/opendaylight/netconf/tree/master/netconf/tools/netconf-testtool
      (vorburger
      
<https://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-meeting/2019/kernel_weekly/opendaylight-meeting-kernel_weekly.2019-01-22-17.06.log.html#l-16>,
      17:18:49)

   2. *YANG 1.1 action support in NETCONF* (vorburger
   
<https://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-meeting/2019/kernel_weekly/opendaylight-meeting-kernel_weekly.2019-01-22-17.06.log.html#l-17>,
   17:20:43)
      1. Martin Sandberg says Ericsson is looking for this, and has had
      some email exchange with jmorvay, there is a JIRA (vorburger
      
<https://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-meeting/2019/kernel_weekly/opendaylight-meeting-kernel_weekly.2019-01-22-17.06.log.html#l-18>,
      17:21:30)
      2. jmorvay
      
<https://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-meeting/2019/kernel_weekly/jmorvay>
      says there is some basic support but more work is needed,
shouldn't be that
      hard for non-clustered, for clustering "also needs some proxy clustered
      services" (vorburger
      
<https://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-meeting/2019/kernel_weekly/opendaylight-meeting-kernel_weekly.2019-01-22-17.06.log.html#l-19>,
      17:22:23)
      3. https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/74745/ (jmorvay
      
<https://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-meeting/2019/kernel_weekly/opendaylight-meeting-kernel_weekly.2019-01-22-17.06.log.html#l-20>,
      17:24:09)
      4. https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/netconf-dev/ (vorburger
      
<https://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-meeting/2019/kernel_weekly/opendaylight-meeting-kernel_weekly.2019-01-22-17.06.log.html#l-22>,
      17:26:52)

   3. *Code Freeze in 2 days* (vorburger
   
<https://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-meeting/2019/kernel_weekly/opendaylight-meeting-kernel_weekly.2019-01-22-17.06.log.html#l-23>,
   17:28:18)
      1. skitt clarifies it's been moved from in 2 days to next week (
      vorburger
      
<https://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-meeting/2019/kernel_weekly/opendaylight-meeting-kernel_weekly.2019-01-22-17.06.log.html#l-24>,
      17:28:36)
      2. rovarga says distribution is currently broken, skitt merging
      netconf right now, and it should be OK after that (vorburger
      
<https://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-meeting/2019/kernel_weekly/opendaylight-meeting-kernel_weekly.2019-01-22-17.06.log.html#l-25>,
      17:29:08)
      3. TSC call on Thursday needs to discuss this (vorburger
      
<https://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-meeting/2019/kernel_weekly/opendaylight-meeting-kernel_weekly.2019-01-22-17.06.log.html#l-26>,
      17:29:26)
      4. rovarga says it should be OK tomorrow (vorburger
      
<https://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-meeting/2019/kernel_weekly/opendaylight-meeting-kernel_weekly.2019-01-22-17.06.log.html#l-27>,
      17:30:06)
      5. jmorvay says his netconf patches could wait for Sodium if he has
      to, rovarga says it would be great to still get it into Neon (
      vorburger
      
<https://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-meeting/2019/kernel_weekly/opendaylight-meeting-kernel_weekly.2019-01-22-17.06.log.html#l-28>,
      17:31:22)
      6. vorburger asks what the timeline and plan for branching and then
      opening master as Sodium will be (vorburger
      
<https://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-meeting/2019/kernel_weekly/opendaylight-meeting-kernel_weekly.2019-01-22-17.06.log.html#l-29>,
      17:34:58)
      7. rovarga says that there should be just 1 day of interruption, so
      we'll have stable/neon (for blockers only) and master open for Sodium the
      day after (vorburger
      
<https://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-meeting/2019/kernel_weekly/opendaylight-meeting-kernel_weekly.2019-01-22-17.06.log.html#l-30>,
      17:36:12)
      8. small request: if someone using multi-patch job in a regular basis
      can review this patch: (LuisGomez
      
<https://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-meeting/2019/kernel_weekly/opendaylight-meeting-kernel_weekly.2019-01-22-17.06.log.html#l-31>,
      17:36:50)
      9. : https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/79586/ (LuisGomez
      
<https://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-meeting/2019/kernel_weekly/opendaylight-meeting-kernel_weekly.2019-01-22-17.06.log.html#l-32>,
      17:36:54)
      10. the TSC call on Thursday needs to make the decision for the code
      freeze cut off, community majority will probably want to post pone in
      (vorburger
      
<https://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-meeting/2019/kernel_weekly/opendaylight-meeting-kernel_weekly.2019-01-22-17.06.log.html#l-33>,
      17:36:54)

   4. *Multi Patch Job* (vorburger
   
<https://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-meeting/2019/kernel_weekly/opendaylight-meeting-kernel_weekly.2019-01-22-17.06.log.html#l-37>,
   17:38:19)
      1. LuisGomez requesting skitt rovarga may be to review
      https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/79586/ (vorburger
      
<https://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-meeting/2019/kernel_weekly/opendaylight-meeting-kernel_weekly.2019-01-22-17.06.log.html#l-38>,
      17:38:28)

   5. *Attendees* (vorburger
   
<https://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-meeting/2019/kernel_weekly/opendaylight-meeting-kernel_weekly.2019-01-22-17.06.log.html#l-40>,
   17:42:38)
      1. vorburger skitt LuisGomez TomP rovarga Martin Sandberg jmorvay (
      vorburger
      
<https://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-meeting/2019/kernel_weekly/opendaylight-meeting-kernel_weekly.2019-01-22-17.06.log.html#l-41>,
      17:43:06)

   6. *Gerrit API* (vorburger
   
<https://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-meeting/2019/kernel_weekly/opendaylight-meeting-kernel_weekly.2019-01-22-17.06.log.html#l-42>,
   17:43:19)
      1. skitt asks for interest in a "bot" which could auto-merge jobs (
      vorburger
      
<https://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-meeting/2019/kernel_weekly/opendaylight-meeting-kernel_weekly.2019-01-22-17.06.log.html#l-51>,
      17:46:57)
      2. LuisGomez says this could be a project for an intern (but still
      needs someone to manage it) (vorburger
      
<https://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-meeting/2019/kernel_weekly/opendaylight-meeting-kernel_weekly.2019-01-22-17.06.log.html#l-52>,
      17:47:13)
      3. vorburger points to this opendaylight-bot, which never went this
      far (to actually "control" Gerrit via API), that was the dream (
      vorburger
      
<https://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-meeting/2019/kernel_weekly/opendaylight-meeting-kernel_weekly.2019-01-22-17.06.log.html#l-53>,
      17:47:44)
      4. vorburger says there are of course existing bot systems using in
      OpenStack and Kubernetes and elsewhere which perhaps could be re-used in
      OpenDaylight (vorburger
      
<https://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-meeting/2019/kernel_weekly/opendaylight-meeting-kernel_weekly.2019-01-22-17.06.log.html#l-54>,
      17:48:12)
      5. https://zuul-ci.org ? LuisGomez says LF already said No to this a
      while ago (vorburger
      
<https://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-meeting/2019/kernel_weekly/opendaylight-meeting-kernel_weekly.2019-01-22-17.06.log.html#l-55>,
      17:50:07)

   7. *Cookies* (vorburger
   
<https://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-meeting/2019/kernel_weekly/opendaylight-meeting-kernel_weekly.2019-01-22-17.06.log.html#l-56>,
   17:52:44)

Meeting ended at 17:52:50 UTC (full logs
<https://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-meeting/2019/kernel_weekly/opendaylight-meeting-kernel_weekly.2019-01-22-17.06.log.html>
).
Action items

   1. (none)

People present (lines said)

   1. vorburger (39)
   2. rovarga (9)
   3. odl_meetbot (4)
   4. jmorvay (2)
   5. LuisGomez (2)
   6. skitt (1)

Generated by MeetBot <http://ci.openstack.org/meetbot.html> 0.1.4.

--
Michael Vorburger, Red Hat
vorbur...@redhat.com | IRC: vorburger @freenode | ~ = http://vorburger.ch
_______________________________________________
controller-dev mailing list
controller-dev@lists.opendaylight.org
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/controller-dev

Reply via email to