J�rgen Zimmermann wrote:
> Hello,
> is there a reason behind the fact that both are in the main directory?
> Moreover, there are still gcc-2.95 packages in contrib along with
> pgcc-2.95 (which someone (Bero) identified as completely broken).
>
> My opinion: Go for gcc-2.95.1 and remove the others completely...
>
> Juergen
It is known that not all of it builds validly on the x86 CPU's with gcc
2.95. As far as we know these are Linux not gcc issues. Fixes for gcc
2.95 to gcc 3.0 may go into Linux 2.2 in time. You should
therefore not use gcc 2.95 to build stable kernels for the moment.
http://www.linux.org.uk/VERSION/relnotes.2212.html
Sergio Korlowsky
