On Fri, 27 Aug 1999, [iso-8859-1] Gr�goire Colbert wrote:
> J�rgen Zimmermann wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> > is there a reason behind the fact that both are in the main directory?
> > Moreover, there are still gcc-2.95 packages in contrib along with
> > pgcc-2.95 (which someone (Bero) identified as completely broken).
> >
> > My opinion: Go for gcc-2.95.1 and remove the others completely...
> >
> > Juergen
>
> I agree with you. I don't understand why we currently have both gcc and pgcc
> in cooker.
>
> Gregus
>
Am I missing something? Is gcc-2.95 ready for producing highly optimized
pentium code? If so then pgcc is an optional and everyone should use gcc.
If not, gcc is left for compatibility and stability (probably compiling
some big project like the linux kernel with an experimental-unstable
compiler like pgcc has always been could not work).
--
Aequam memento rebus in arduis servare mentem...
Mauro Tortonesi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://ing49.unife.it/keyser
Ferrara Linux User Group http://www.ferrara.linux.it
