"Chris L. Mason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> 
> Disk /dev/hdb: 255 heads, 63 sectors, 1232 cylinders
> Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 bytes
> 
>    Device Boot    Start       End    Blocks   Id  System
> /dev/hdb1             1       392   3148708+   5  Extended
> /dev/hdb3           588       849   2104515   83  Linux native
> /dev/hdb4           850      1232   3076447+  83  Linux native
> /dev/hdb5             1       359   2883604+  83  Linux native
> /dev/hdb6           360       392    265040+  82  Linux swap
> 
> > echo -e "x\np\nq\n" | /sbin/fdisk /dev/hdc
> > (which is, (p)rint in e(x)pert mode of fdisk)
> 
> Disk /dev/hdb: 255 heads, 63 sectors, 1232 cylinders
> 
> Nr AF  Hd Sec  Cyl  Hd Sec  Cyl   Start    Size ID
>  1 00   1   1    0 254  63  391      63 6297417 05
>  2 00   0   0    0   0   0    0       0       0 00
>  3 00   0   1  587 254  63  848 9430155 4209030 83
>  4 00   0   1  849 254  63 102313639185 6152895 83
>  5 00   2   1    0 254  63  358      63 5767209 83
>  6 00   1   2  359 254  63  391      63  530081 82
> 

creating a starting extended partition was badly handled, but now it's ok

if you could re-test and tell me more (now it should be ok :)

i just tested the following with no problem


Disk /dev/hda: 255 heads, 63 sectors, 1027 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 bytes

   Device Boot    Start       End    Blocks   Id  System
/dev/hda1   *         1       301   2417751    5  Extended
/dev/hda2           927      1027    811282+  82  Linux swap
/dev/hda3           302       586   2289262+  83  Linux
/dev/hda4           587       926   2731050   83  Linux
/dev/hda5             1       104    835317   83  Linux
/dev/hda6           105       301   1582371   83  Linux

Disk /dev/hda: 255 heads, 63 sectors, 1027 cylinders

Nr AF  Hd Sec  Cyl  Hd Sec  Cyl   Start    Size ID
 1 80   1   1    0 254  63  300      63 4835502 05
 2 00   0   1  926 254  63 102314876190 1622565 82
 3 00   0   1  301 254  63  585 4835565 4578525 83
 4 00   0   1  586 254  63  925 9414090 5462100 83
 5 00   2   1    0 254  63  103      63 1670634 83
 6 00   1   1  104 254  63  300      63 3164742 83


> 
> Okay, I had one other problem too.  As other people reported, the GUI
> really started to slow down.  It was okay for the beginning when it asked
> for the Language, and the install options, but when diskdrake started to
> launch, it really got slow.
> 

yes, i must find out :(



cu Pixel.

Reply via email to