On Tue, 21 Sep 1999, Arthur wrote:
> >> Why is Roxen better than Apache?
> >
> > o It's written in pike, a interpreter-language
>
> How can that be faster than something compiled? Has anyone compared
> performance of Roxen vs. Apache at high load?
If you need performance and you're using static content, install kernel
2.3.18 and give khttpd a try. It's MUCH faster.
LLaP
bero
--
Tired of waiting for Windows 2000?
STOP WAITING! http://www.ms-windows-2000.com/
- [Cooker] Would like to contribute packages Oliver Schade
- Re: [Cooker] Would like to contribute packages Arthur
- Re: [Cooker] Would like to contribute pack... Oliver Schade
- Re: [Cooker] Would like to contribute ... Arthur
- Re: [Cooker] Would like to contrib... Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
- Re: [Cooker] Would like to contrib... Oliver Schade
- Re: [Cooker] Would like to contribute packages Rick Collette
