On Tue, 21 Sep 1999, Arthur wrote:

> >> Why is Roxen better than Apache?
> >
> > o It's written in pike, a interpreter-language
> 
> How can that be faster than something compiled?  Has anyone compared
> performance of Roxen vs. Apache at high load?

If you need performance and you're using static content, install kernel
2.3.18 and give khttpd a try. It's MUCH faster.

LLaP
bero

-- 
Tired of waiting for Windows 2000?
        STOP WAITING! http://www.ms-windows-2000.com/

Reply via email to