On 9 Jan 2000, Pixel wrote:

> high security you said, high security you get!

=)  Understandable, I can see how an invalid search path could be an
issue.  Thanks.

> currently using 3.1.9, is it new enough ;-)

That's good =)

> and what about 3.3.6 :-)

Havn't had time to look at 3.3.6 source yet, but if it understands the ID
0x4C4D and forces the clock to 8000 for a 1400x1050 res it should have the
patch in it.  If that's in 3.3.6 everything should be OK.

Thanks,
-dws

Reply via email to