"Brian J. Murrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I guess my idea of a freeswan (IPSec) package on the crypto site was not
> considered a good idea? freeswan-1.3 just came out yesterday and I am
> about to go build kernels and a freeswan package. It would be so much
> nicer if *everybody* had access to this stuff.
Yes i would like to do this but we need a different kernel package for
ipsec, and i don't have the time to maintain it.
> How about a kernel without IDE built in? I would like to use ide-scsi
> emulation (for my cdrom drive), but alas it only works if the IDE driver
> is NOT loaded. Why not include the IDE driver as a loadable module and
> include it in an initrd image if the user's boot disk is IDE, exactly
> the same as I do with my bootable SCSI drive. I have the aic7xxx driver
> in my initrd image rather than linking into the kernel.
you want always to use initrd ?
--
MandrakeSoft http://www.mandrakesoft.com/
--Chmouel
