Pablo Saratxaga wrote:
> Kaixo!
>
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 02:22:34PM +0100, Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
>
> > > mozilla-5.0-0.13.1mdk for M13 release 1, and mozilla-5.0-0.13.2mdk,...
> > make that mozilla-5.0-0.m13.1mdk for M13 release 1, and ....
>
> Why not 0.M13 ? M13 is more meaningful than m13 (at least for me)
>
> > How about CVS versions?
>
> Should we release CVS versions ?
> I think milestones are out often enough that we don't need to put out CVS
> versions. (and people that really want them knows how to get the CVS sources,
> how to make a tarball out of them, and type rpm -b ...)
>
> > Any suggestions on how to name them? mozilla-5.0-0.cvs20000225?
> >
> > Stefan
>
> --
> Ki �a vos v�ye b�n,
> Pablo Saratxaga
>
> http://www.ping.be/~pin19314/ PGP Key available, key ID: 0x8F0E4975
Well as of current the CVS version of last night is a hell of a lot more stable
the M13 is, M13 was about as stable as running windows;) but as of feb 25th the
CVS release is stable enough to use day to day, so untill m14 comes out I would
sugest that we go with a cvs copy possibly.... would make it possible to just
install and start using in replacement for netscape.
-DarkWlf
