i've alerady sent this in this morning but it seems that sympa just
swallowed my message without poisting it on cooker ...i'm erposting this,
with a few additions to the message.
> functionality in
> bluefish, or does it rely on the external browser technique ? I'm
> not trying to
> be difficult, but I have been looking for a genuinely WYSIWYG
> HTML editor for
> Linux for ages. Amaya and Star Office are about the closest I
> found so far,
i gotta update amaya in contribs ...it's _very_ old,yet , when i have time.
i put in the WYSIWYG thing. so you don't think it's even close to what you
see is what you get ? you can't just take the messsage at face value that
it's ABSOLUTELY WYSIWYG, see, a page would probably look different in M$IE
under Windows and Netscape under X! however it will look similar, so that's
the point i was trying o make. you would classify netscpae composer as
WYSIWYG, yes or no ? however it doesn't display the same for every browser,
due to the difference in the interface, the library (e.g. mozilla is gtk,
while netscape 4.x is motif)
> they don't require an external browser, but they both currently have major
> flaws. To me WYSIWYG means being able to pick up a graphic in the editor
> WYSIWYG window and move it around, or resize frames, or type type
> text straight
> into frame sets etc. etc.. Coffee Cup don't describe themselves
> as a WYSIWYG
> editor so why describe bluefish this way ?
>
> Does anyone know a really good WYSIWYG HTML editor for Linux ?
>
bluefish. or just do
cat << EOF > myfile.html
won't be WYSIWYG though ;-)
> Owen
>
> On Wed, 17 May 2000, you wrote:
> > from my php3/C book...
> >
> > main {
> > #!DEFINE WYSIWYG == "What You See Is What You Get";
> > printf WYSIWYG;
> > return 0;
> > }
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "OS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
