On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 06:20, Brook Humphrey wrote: > Remember I'm not talking about computer savvy users here but by far the > majority of normal everyday business users who just think the computer is a > tool and if something is different it throws them off for weeks just to > figure it out. For these types of uses kde cant be beat. Gnome does have it's > place but for simplicity sake gnome is not it.
Er, I don't quite understand that. This is exactly the segment GNOME is aiming at. By default it behaves rather more like Windows than KDE does (double-click is default, window behaviour is similar) and the whole philosophy of the 2.x series is to simplify things down as far as possible...can you back up the argument that KDE 3 is "simpler" than GNOME 2? -- adamw
