Am Dienstag, 1. April 2003 13:02 schrieb Florin: > Hi there, > > I have done this mainly because of the naming issue ... it was more easy > to be to upload the package in cooker using the same name ... and the idea > is to get rid of sasl 1.* soon ... so it's a transition period ... > > cheers,
OK, clear to understand, but there are some drawbacks. First, sasl1 can no longer use the password file (sasldb) from privious versions (now sasl1 uses gdbm, previous versions used db3.3) and there is no easy way to solve. To compile sasl2 you need db4.0 devel package, but sasl1 does not support db4.0. To solve this, I had to grab the SRPM from mdk9.0 and replaced the mdk9.1 sasl1 packages. And there I can use my ldap patch for the sasl1 stuff. By the way, ldap is using gdbm too, so you cann not upgrade from 9.0 to 9.1 by simply replacing the packages. What is even courious is the fact, that after a recompilation of the ldap srpm the ldap server uses db3. strange. Martin -- ------------------------------------------------------------ H E L I X Gesellschaft f�r Software & Engineering mbH ------------------------------------------------------------ Hanauer Landstrasse 52 Telefon (069) 4789 35-30 60314 Frankfurt am Main Telefax (069) 4789 35-44 ------------------------------------------------------------ http://www.helix-gmbh.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------
pgp00000.pgp
Description: signature
