Am Dienstag, 1. April 2003 13:02 schrieb Florin:
Hi there,
I have done this mainly because of the naming issue ... it was more easy to be to upload the package in cooker using the same name ... and the idea is to get rid of sasl 1.* soon ... so it's a transition period ...
I'd really think that debian solution (two sets of packages) is cleaner and more maintainable, but we've already discussed this point and won't rehash it now
cheers,
OK,
clear to understand, but there are some drawbacks. First, sasl1 can no longer use the password file (sasldb) from privious versions (now sasl1 uses gdbm, previous versions used db3.3) and there is no easy way to solve. To compile sasl2 you need db4.0 devel package, but sasl1 does not support db4.0. To solve this, I had to grab the SRPM from mdk9.0 and replaced the mdk9.1 sasl1 packages. And there I can use my ldap patch for the sasl1 stuff.
And then there's bug 2410 still present in the final package delivered with 9.1 (no, I didn't install it yet but I looked at the rpm on the cd):
<http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2410>
(which in turn makes impossible the solution to bug 2411 <http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2411>)
Bye -- Luca Olivetti Note.- This message reached you today, it may not tomorrow if you are using MAPS or other RBL. They arbitrarily list IP addresses not related in any way to spam, disrupting Internet connectivity. See http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/05/21/1944247 and http://theory.whirlycott.com/~phil/antispam/rbl-bad/rbl-bad.html
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
