-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > Levi Ramsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Are you sure about that? Packaging gtkmm2 is rather a fcrozat's > thing.
And here I though we were aiming to have more community maintenance? > Last time I asked, he said he didn't really want to do it > until no package in the distro need it, which is rather sensible. > How can Austin commit his packages which require it if it isn't in the distro? What if people just want to be able to develop with it? Or is Mandrake not a distro for developers, as indicated by the persistent issues with packages like libqt3 (QTDIR not set as /usr/share/doc/qt-3.1.1/README.Mandrake_Linux claims) and kdevelop (for which it is almost impossible to figure out how to get the qt and kde documentation installed and indexed)? IIRC, wxGTK was in contrib long before anything in contrib required it ... Buchan - -- |--------------Another happy Mandrake Club member--------------| Buchan Milne Mechanical Engineer, Network Manager Cellphone * Work +27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x121 Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za GPG Key http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc 1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE+iru1rJK6UGDSBKcRAspCAJ4839SicavQZpxPx2KUp9D/JRUyJwCfVhgM u5P5wtDOyrz0+LTufVdOdQA= =PfGw -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
