-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 03 April 2003 19:34, G�tz Waschk wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 3. April 2003, 17:50:22 Uhr MET, schrieb Guillaume Rousse: > > Ainsi parlait Austin : > > > We've discussed this before. > > > Bzip the png icons ==> more work, larger file size > > > Don't bzip the icons ==> they don't show up in the CVS > > > So the packager has an 'executive' decision to make every time. > > > > The CVS issue is just an upload script problem however, that should not > > prevail over the more general file size issue. There should be a general > > policy there, not an individual packager choice. > > I think this is not that important that it would require a policy. > Both versions work fine apart from the CVS upload issue. There's a > recommendation to bzip2 the sources, but it's not enforced, e.g. if > the tar.gz version is smaller than the bzip2 version. I think it would be good with more policies.. it would be more consistent, IMHO I think that too many people are using their own way to do a whole lot of stuff, sure we should accept peoples preferences too, but I kinda dislike it when people differ way too much and often produces ugly rpms..
my 2 cents.. - -- Regards, Per �yvind Karlsen Sintrax Solutions http://www.sintrax.net - +47 41681061 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+jH0Kv8F7V9JOSuURAhT5AJ4kvIcsz7p9U5bik+qALw7VejCTZQCg2ZnS bDo73rwvgqdSfrzatpenzss= =lQpg -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
