Ainsi parlait Oden Eriksson :
> fredagen den 6 juni 2003 01.45 skrev Guillaume Rousse:
> > [Contrib-RPM]
>
> The purpose with how I was thinking was that one could install the web
> applications relocated with a rpm switch to a unknown location to prevent
> hammering etc. There was no need to use access control in the first step. I
> was about to make a meta rpm package that installed the most useful admin
> like web applications to a "on-the-fly" generated location including access
> control that was totally unknown to others than the system owner. I thought
> this was a beautiful arrangement, but then I just could be crazy.
I prefer per-application access control, rather than global setting.
> As you
> now has decided to put these in well known static locations you also have
> to be responsible to fix the other packages and maybe also continue to
> maintain them.
I didn't decided anything, i'm just trying to setup an explicit policy for
webapps. Moreover, it is always possible to rebuild the package with juste
changing the webroot macro if you want an other location.
--
If such a program has not crashed yet, it is waiting for a critical moment
before it crashes.
-- Murphy's Computer Laws n�6
