On Friday 30 May 2003 21:09, Adam Williamson wrote: > At first I thought that too, but it doesn't hold up against the standard > test - try changing it a bit. Imagine it's a source for footballs - > you'd probably call it a footballs media, not a football media. I think > it's OK. Not 100% sure, though, admittedly. I don't own a style guide, > it'd be handy for this kind of situation I think :)
Well... I'd call a (single) source of footballs... a football medium, and an arbitray (including, potentially, one) such sources... football media... for what it's worth. That would lead to a source of RPMs being an "RPM medium," and an arbitrary number of them, I would call RPM media. -Chuck S.
