> Neither do I. Probably because I don't know the intention of creating > those debug info yet. Is this something new from stock rpm 4.2?
Apparently, but I am not sure ... I will ask on the maintainers list ... > If so, > I'd guess the name "debug" is chosen because Red Hat don't use this as > package name. And I guess that (even excluding all the other distros) Redhat must be the only people that make RPMS? Since they have the most monolithic packages, I don't think they should only use their own package names for smoething like this. I mean if the do that, then they might in the same wsay decide that all release numbers in existence are composed only of numeric characters!
