No need for the "hack," if the package name is versioned as it should be, kernel2.5 suffices.
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > I'm asking myself if it would not be good to add a > "hackkernel2.5" in contrib? > > [...] > > 2- provide a 2.5 in contrib but call it "hackkernel2.5" and don't > allow installing it from the install, so that it's clear it's > bleeding not supported stuff
