Mark, Thx for this. I will take a look after drinking some "wine"'s to celebrate! I must say I'm impressed by the current (june 2003) status of wine. This is the first time that printing (with CUPS) and saving (from Word 97!) just works without any need for windows dll's. And I managed to install Office 97 from the office 97 cd. The time is near that I can delete my windows 98 partition!
I just hope that we will have wine decently packaged when 9.2 ships. The current status will not do. BTW and FWIW, I agree with your opinion about not splitting libraries etc out of the main packages. It just increases the chance of errors, as has been recently demonstrated :-) John On Monday 30 June 2003 20:36, Mark Draheim wrote: > On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 18:21:41 +0200 > > John van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The links are like this: > > > > winhelp.exe -> > > ../../../../home/peroyvind/rpm/tmp/wine-root/usr/lib/wine/winhelp.exe > > .so > > > > And of course I do not have this file... > > > > > > Hmmm, > > > > back to building wine myself... > > if you're building yourself, try this one: > > http://amor.cms.hu-berlin.de/~h0444y2j/pub/winefiles-20030630.tar.bz2 > > these are my current files, patches and spec for CVS wine. But they > should still apply to the June snapshot. Note that there are massive > changes to libification which is why these changes never made it into > cooker. The spec builds only wine and wine-devel, with utils and libs > merged into wine. I might consider splitting out the arts/KDE stuff to > avoid having to install QT and KDE on GNOME-only systems, but I won't > discuss libification unless someone comes up with some pretty > good points in favour of splits. > > Nevertheless, if you're feeling bored, you can try and merge my changes > into current cooker spec and then lobby for inclusion :) > > Have a look at the changelog of the spec for details. > > Mark > > ps: I hope I included all files...
