On Tue, 2003-07-01 at 11:49, Buchan Milne wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Tue, 2003-07-01 at 08:45, Juan Quintela wrote: > > > Does this fix the, er, rather major problem with the last kernel, i.e., > > it appearing not to work and nuking people's boot? I would've thought > > that would be first on the priority list :). I'm not updating my kernel > > till I'm told it's fixed... > > If everyone assumes this opinion, who's going to tell us? (I have a good > excuse, one-day lag on my mirror ;-).
That's SEP (Somebody Else's Problem) :) > Anyway, if you have a currently-working non-default-named (ie > linux/linux-nonfb/linux-smp etc etc) image, installing a new kernel > won't mess with it, so you should be able to boot your current kernel > without problems. People were reporting the new kernel messing up the boot for previous kernels, too, so I'm extra wary of trying it. -- adamw
