Buchan Milne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > we won't add large utilities that don't fit the aim of the rescue > > (small ones as well, actually). > > > > Granted, but is it unreasonable to request an editor that most newbies > would be able to use (say to fix a corrupted lilo.conf or similar), > which only adds an extra 10k to the uncompressed image size?
Yes it would be nice, however newbie problems should already be addressed by automatic menu actions of the rescue? -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
