On Sun, 2003-07-06 at 01:31, Duncan wrote:

> That's what I thought I said..  However, I attribute it to something else..  
> the binary only bit of the nvidia module, as I had to force 
> recompile/reinstall of the nvidia module after compiling and switching to 
> 2.4.21, as the nvidia installer otherwise gave me a warning/error about me 
> using a different compiler to compile the module than I had to compile the 
> kernel, tho it was the same one, and I'd just finished compiling the kernel.  
> The only reasonable explanation for that is that the nvidia binary-only 
> component was compiled with a different compiler, which would be expected 
> since I rather doubt they could be using the latest Cooker gcc, when I 
> believe this release (the latest, but..) was out b4 the latest gcc!
> 
> Thus, I think the problem is the stupid binary-only core, which of necessity 
> HAS to be compiled with something older than the newest gcc, rather than 
> devfsd or some other such thing.  I expect the reason it won't load by 
> default now has to do with the compiler differences, tho it will still load 
> if specifically loaded, as it is when loaded from modules or manually.

No, that's not it. It didn't stop working with a kernel version change
for me; it was working with a kernel then stopped working with the same
kernel when something else changed. It's not the gcc version.
-- 
adamw


Reply via email to