On Sun, 2003-07-06 at 16:39, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Jul 2003, Michael Scherer wrote:
> > and the winner is ....
> > minilogd.
> 
> Well why do you think Andrey's patch i resent was called devfs.minilogd ? 
> I think the problem is really in the kernel, but nobody wants to try:(

probably because it's a bit of a pain to apply the patch and recompile
the kernel...is there no easier way of testing?
-- 
adamw


Reply via email to