On Sun, 2003-07-06 at 20:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On 6 Jul 2003, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > On Sun, 2003-07-06 at 16:39, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > On Sun, 6 Jul 2003, Michael Scherer wrote: > > > > and the winner is .... > > > > minilogd. > > > > > > Well why do you think Andrey's patch i resent was called devfs.minilogd ? > > > I think the problem is really in the kernel, but nobody wants to try:( > > > > probably because it's a bit of a pain to apply the patch and recompile > > the kernel...is there no easier way of testing? > Ah...but I still suspect you are all being lazy. > > It is not that much work to compile a minimal kernel with this patch. It > is a timing issue, every change in rc.sysinit can trigger it. And > reverting to an old minilogd is not a real solution. Well..If you all stay > being lazy I might build a kernel rpm with the patch. > > I thought this list was for cookers....
We're *lazy* cookers. :) -- adamw
