Buchan Milne wrote: > And who decided to use gdbm for everything in 9.1??
I dunno, but I see that as a whole lot better than using Sleepycat. AFAIK, gdbm hasn't broken compatibility with itself. That as opposed to using Sleepycat that breaks every couple months when they decide to come out with a new revision and not keep it compatible. What's good about that? I'm tired of this db2, db3, db4, db4.1, db4.1099999 1/2 etc. Aren't you?
