On Fri 18 Jul 2003 09:53, Buchan Milne posted as excerpted below: > I think the biggest demand for a split list was coming from those > interested in the server aspects.
It could also involve those NOT interested in the server aspects, as some of the biggest threads are server related. I am such a one. Personally, I could do without most of the kernel discussion as well, as I use a kernel.org self-compiled kernel and no initrd (altho I've been following the 2.5/2.6 discussion with interest, trying to decide when I want to switch), and without the install stuff for the most part, since I constantly upgrade. Thus, I support the general idea of a split, as it would certainly make life a bit easier for me. However, I understand enough of the practical implications to know a split might not work that well in practice, even for me. Still, the idea of having servers and install on separate lists which I can ignore, and kernel on a list which I can filter more intensely and check maybe weekly rather than almost daily, IS pretty enticing. -- Duncan - List replies preferred. "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." Benjamin Franklin
