On Saturday 02 August 2003 11:32 am, Benjamin Pflugmann wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I just noticed some glitches while using urpmc:
>
> libsmbclient0-3.0-0.alpha21.3mdk -> libsmbclient0-2.2.8a-7mdk
> * Tue Jul 15 2003 Buchan Milne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2.2.8a-7mdk
> - reduce optimisations (from -O2 to -O1) until we find the real
> problem. smbmount and smbpasswd should work now (please test)
> - specify CFLAGS in one place to reduce confusion ...
> [...a lot of log entries...]
> * Sat Jan 24 1998 John H Terpstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> - Many optimisations (some suggested by Manoj Kasichainula
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Use of chkconfig in place of individual symlinks to
> /etc/rc.d/init/smb - Compounded make line
> - Updated smb.init restart mechanism
> - Use compound mkdir -p line instead of individual calls to mkdir
> - Fixed smb.conf file path for log files
> - Fixed smb.conf file path for incoming smb print spool directory
> - Added a number of options to smb.conf file
> - Added smbadduser command (missed from all previous RPMs) - Doooh!
> - Added smbuser file and smb.conf file updates for username map
>
> !!! CHANGELOG TRUNCATED OR CURRENT ENTRY MISSING !!!
>
> Hm. Let's see. The versions are correct (i.e. I have
> libsmbclient0-3.0-0.alpha21.3mdk installed; libsmbclient0-2.2.8a-7mdk
> and libsmbclient0-3.0-0.alpha21.3mdk are available on my medium).
>
> libsmbclient0-3.0-0.alpha21.3mdk is from contrib and
> libsmbclient0-2.2.8a-7mdk is from cooker. Does this make a difference?
>
> Neither urpmi nor rpmdrake want to upgrade this package ("urpmi
> libsmbclient" -> "Everything already installed"). Do you need any
> further info?
>
> libgdbm2-1.8.0-22mdk -> libgdbm2-1.8.0-23mdk
> * Mon Jul 28 2003 Gwenole Beauchesne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 1.8.0 -23mdk - mkbliname
>
> * Thu Jul 10 2003 Laurent MONTEL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 1.8.0
> -22mdk - Rebuild
>
> * Wed Jun 04 2003 Stefan van der Eijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 1.8.0-21mdk
> - rebuild for deps
> [...a lot of log entries...]
> !!! CHANGELOG TRUNCATED OR CURRENT ENTRY MISSING !!!
>
> I guess the problem is with the space in the version numbers of the
> last two log entries. So this is more a problem of the package, not of
> urpmc. But maybe urpmc could stop displaying the log, as soon as it
> found the first version which it positively identifies as being lower
> than the current one? Here that would be 1.8.0-21.
>
> Ah, and is it possible to print the line
>
> !!! PACKAGE NOT CURRENTLY INSTALLED FULL CHANGELOG SHOWN !!!
>
> at the start of the belonging changelog, not at the end?
>
>
> Aside from that, did I already mention that I love this tool? :-)
>
>
> And some glitches in packages, which urpmc showed:
>
> GConf-1.0.9-8mdk -> GConf-1.0.9-9mdk
> libGConf1-1.0.9-8mdk -> libGConf1-1.0.9-9mdk
> !!! NO CHANGELOG ENTRIES NEWER THAN INSTALLED PACKAGE !!!
>
> urpmc is right. Verified with rpm -q --changlog by hand. The last log
> entry is labeled as 1.0.9-8mdk.
>
> Bye,
>
> Benjamin.
What is urpmc? What does it do? I have vague ideas but would like it written
in stone <G>...
--
Ken Thompson -- WA7SYR
Payette, Idaho
