On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 08:58:09PM +0200, Guillaume Rousse wrote: > And spam-assassin too, i know. But all those cases rely on individual > packager decision, which is plainly wrong IMHO. Either all packages > should be rebuildable, for a given number of previous release, and > support should be provided globally, or none. Current situation make > no sense for me.
Some of us are already maintaing the packages for multiple distro releases. For a variety of different reasons... Using on a different distro version locally, club, personal tress, etc... There's probably not enough time to spend to do it globally, but I'm going to be really opposed to saying that I can't maintain that backwards compatability in packages I want it in because it's exceedingly tedious to maintain two sets of packages when I can maintain one that builds both places. -- Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://ben.reser.org "What upsets me is not that you lied to me, but that from now on I can no longer believe you." -- Nietzsche
