Le jeu 21/08/2003 � 14:03, Pixel a �crit : > FACORAT Fabrice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > can you think of a better name for the "Do" button? > > > > No, it's the design which is bad from the beginning : > > > > + Graphic Card > > + Monitor > > + Resolution > > + Options > > + Test > > + Save Settings > > > > Quit Do > > what does it change?
The "save settings", but it's wrong too. + Graphic Card + Monitor + Resolution + Options ---------- ------- ------ ----------- | Cancel | |Apply | |Test| |Configure| --------- ------- ------ ----------- If you hit Cancel, it just quit without saving if you hit Apply, it show config and ask if you want to save & quit. when u select an entry, for example monitor, you hit modify. when you want to test, just hit Test, show config and ask if you want to test it. you can maybe mix cancel & apply, i.e named it Quit or Done, then show config and ask if you want to save or just quit without saving settings. 1�/ If u named do as configure ( which is better in my opinion as you want to configure/reconfigure a setting ), you have to remove test as you can't configure test, so test should be a button. 2�/ maybe XFdrake should propose just after the test in case it was a success if the user want to save the settings and then quit if he says yes. 3�/ it's not obvious at first sight that quit allow you to save ort quit without saving, but 4 buttons on a little screen may be too much ...
