-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 26 August 2003 21:36, Abel Cheung wrote: > The permissions problem is the packager's personal choice, if it > persists. hmm, we should keep some consistency, but it really doesn't matter > On the other hand, I think keeping the patches is a good > thing. If the patches are desired in later releases, it can always > be added back conveniently, without rescueing patch from CVS. (Though > I really don't know if the patches are really obsolete or not.) uhr? it's no problem at all to grab those patches from cvs, and including them all takes up a lot of space and messes things up, and usually we don't want any patches back later when we have removed them, mostly because they're merged upstream or something similar.. - -- Regards, Per Øyvind Karlsen Sintrax Solutions http://www.sintrax.net - +47 41681061 - -------------------------------------------- GPG Key: http://sintrax.net/~hawkeye/key.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/S7xHv8F7V9JOSuURAtMhAJ9K4PQodsRSNXwVZdmpIbISJXCM9gCdHae8 g8PBELFNYCWBeA7NQjjYcNI= =QtZ6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
