Ainsi parlait Abel Cheung :
> Anyway, I'm eager to see your patch against find-requires go into rpm
> package, that's a much more automated solution.
It is still not a good idea to add as buildrequires it to a gazillion spec,
either manually or automatically. Just adding rpm-build requires would be
more consistent with current solution used with other build tools. AFAIK,
nothing buildrequires autoconf, automake, gcc, they are considered as
implicit build dependencies.
--
If your advance is going well, you are walking into an ambush
-- Murphy's Military Laws n°6- Re: [Cooker] pkgconfig not required by -devel Abel Cheung
- Re: [Cooker] pkgconfig not required by -d... Michael Scherer
- Re: [Cooker] pkgconfig not required by -d... Michael Scherer
- Re: [Cooker] pkgconfig not required by -d... Stefan van der Eijk
- Re: [Cooker] pkgconfig not required by -d... Guillaume Rousse
- Re: [Cooker] pkgconfig not required by -d... Abel Cheung
- Re: [Cooker] pkgconfig not required by -d... Stefan van der Eijk
- Re: [Cooker] pkgconfig not required by -d... Michael Scherer
- Re: [Cooker] pkgconfig not required by -devel Michael Scherer
- Re: [Cooker] pkgconfig not required by -devel Abel Cheung
- Re: [Cooker] pkgconfig not required by -devel Guillaume Rousse
- Re: [Cooker] pkgconfig not required by -d... Abel Cheung
- Re: [Cooker] pkgconfig not required by -d... Ben Reser
- Re: [Cooker] pkgconfig not required by -d... Guillaume Rousse
