> On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 18:27:34 +0200 (MEST) > Svetoslav Slavtchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 09:29:11 +0200 (MEST) > > > Svetoslav Slavtchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > an update for dvd+rw-tools is needed for support of data dvd copy > > > > (and making k3b quiet ) > > > > > > > > i tried to package current cvs > > > > (anyone interested to review the spec ? , and may be upload to > contrib) > > > > > > > > http://varna.demon.co.uk/~svetlio/ruby-contrib/mdk-cook/hack-k3b/ > > > > > > I can upload k3b into contrib, but I don't have write access in main,
> > > maybe > > > CC'ing the maintainer or filing a bugreport in bugzilla against > > > dvd+rw-tools > > > is a good idea? > > > > :) > > 1.) bug report, that the version is not current? > > (pretty much packages could fall in this criteria :) ) > > Ah, it's also a version update... > I didn't really look at that, but you will want to mail warly that you > want to > upgrade it from 5.11.4.6.4 to 5.12.4.7.4, and why. > He only wants version upgrades in main with a good reason, and since he is > also the maintainer of the package, you need him. > > > or it causes a worning with not included package because of 1.) > > Ehh, just a warning, and everything works ok for the rest? > Maybe the warning can be disabled in k3b_0.10 in some way? No idea yet. i'll mail him, the warning can be disabled (checkbox) settings->configure k3b->misc->check system configuration but data-dvd copy won't be available > > > For hack-k3b, I'd rather name it k3b_0.10 or k3b_0.10cvs or so, > because > > > it's > > > just a cvs release, not a hacked up release, right? > > > > should i change it, or it's not a problem for you ? > > Sorry, I wasn't clear. > It was decided a while ago that packages which are patched by mandrake, > can be > called hack%name, because it's a hacked up version of the original. I > think > there was a cdrecord package which deserved that name. > Most packages which are called hack%name are not much more then > development > releases from the projects cvs (hackabiword, hackeroaster), so the > preferred > name would then be something like k3b_0.10, or k3b_0.10cvs, like the > gettext_0.12 package in contrib. Just compare it to sylpheed and > sylpheed-claws, both codebases for essentially the same project. > > I don't really care of it should be k3b_0.10 or k3b_0.10cvs, but there are > libpackages made from it also, and a libk3b_0.100 as packagename is rather > confusing, while libk3b_0.10cvs0 sounds just a bit more sane :-) > I can change it, that's not too much trouble. I was asking to check if > hack-k3b was the right naming or not, and what your opinion is about it. Ok, name it as you want :) :=) and push it to contrib it's not hacked package, just a cvs release ( i had a patch that adds a speed selection for DVD burning, but it seems that it's not very usefull ((and patch not finished)) so i droped it ) best, svetljo -- COMPUTERBILD 15/03: Premium-e-mail-Dienste im Test -------------------------------------------------- 1. GMX TopMail - Platz 1 und Testsieger! 2. GMX ProMail - Platz 2 und Preis-Qualit�tssieger! 3. Arcor - 4. web.de - 5. T-Online - 6. freenet.de - 7. daybyday - 8. e-Post
