Le dim 28/09/2003 � 14:30, Michael Altizer a �crit : > Michael Reinsch wrote: > > >Hi! > > > >On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 14:22:14 +0200 > >Steffen Barszus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > >>>- How to have more contributors? > >>> > >>> > >>Decreasing time consumption and power needed to participate. It was > >>sometimes like fighting against windmills to get heared on the cooker > >>list. Splitting up the lists could help here. > >> > >> > > > >I am against splitting up cooker list because I think nearly everyone > >will end up subscribing all/most of those lists. > > > >And another problem we will see: which list is the correct one for my > >question / proposal / discussion? So people will CC all lists which > >might be concerned which will bring us even more traffic. > > > >You might want to have a look at OpenOffice.org. They have several > >mailing lists for each sub project. This is (imho) quite confusing and > >you see a lot of CCs. > > > > > I agree with not splitting the list into subcatagories, but one thing > that really should be done is splitting the bug reports to a different > list, though replies should still go to the main cooker list. (Note: I > just use a filter to move bug reports to their own folder for seperate > reading, but to many who don't take the time to do so they may complain > about the abundance of emails. Also this would be easier on the dialup > crowd since Bugzilla emails make up ~33% of the received emails.) > -Michael
100% agree. put bugzilla on its own ML. Having bugzilla on cooker ML is disturbing and on top of that you can't respond directly as you do with cooker. So this is really appart. People wanting to log bugs will join this special ML and everything will be fine. At this time I have 655 unread bugzilla mails ! I will take me more than a day to read everything ( and skip what I don't want ).
