Vincent Danen wrote: > On Tue Sep 30, 2003 at 01:48:44PM +0200, Pierre Jarillon wrote: > > > > http://bugs.mandrakelinux.com/
> > > Cool. Something to play with in future :) . As said before, I can't > > > really afford to work on/with cooker, this way might be a lot better > > > solution for me to contribute to Mandrake > > Good conception. It looks faster than bugzilla, but it is empty. > > Bugzilla is too slow : to display a bug such as > > http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5066 > > has a weight of 438084 bytes. This is mainly due to the great number of > > <option> in the <select> markup. > > With a 56k modem, at least100 seconds are necessary to load this page, > > and 15s with an ADSL 512k. This is too much. > > But http://bugs.mandrakelinux.com/ is not a valid HTML :-( Why? > I'm not sure what you mean. What's not valid HMTL? It can't be validated: http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fbugs.mandrakelinux.com%2F -- "...[B]e quick to listen, slow to speak and slow to become angry...." James 1:19 NIV Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 Felix Miata *** http://members.ij.net/mrmazda/
