On Wed Oct 01, 2003 at 12:08:46PM +0200, Guillaume Rousse wrote:

> > > Actually, there is no point just explaining servers in contrib are not
> > > updated. A real explanation of mandrake policy would be far better:
> > > - what is main, what is contrib, and what is update ?
> > > - what does get updated ?
> > > etc...
> >
> > Good grief.. everyone wants policy policy policy... =)
> >
> > Main is what is in the main tree.  You know, what comes in the download
> > edition.  The stuff that is labelled "not contribs".  The meat of the
> > distro.  The equivilant of Mandrake-devel/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS
> >
> > Contribs is contribs.  It's labelled as such.
> >
> > updates?  Should be pretty obvious.  Updates are stuff in main that need
> > fixing for whatever reason.
> >
> > Main gets updated.  contribs doesn't.
> >
> > I don't see what is so difficult about this.  This is how it has *always*
> > been.  It hasn't changed.  No need for a policy regarding it.  This is just
> > how it's done.
> I know all of this, just because i've been there for 4 years now. My point is 
> that i'm fed up with oral tradition. No one knows about contribs outside 
> cooker communauty. Among the few newbies that know about urpmi, they always 
> use urpmi.update whereas none of their sources ever change. Etc...
> 
> What we lack here is a clear explanation of mdk functionning targeted at 
> outside world.

Your problem then is not the lack of a policy defining support (or lack
thereof) for contribs then.  Your problem is the lack of awareness of
contribs.

I can't help you on the last one.

-- 
MandrakeSoft Security; http://www.mandrakesecure.net/
Online Security Resource Book; http://linsec.ca/
"lynx -source http://linsec.ca/vdanen.asc | gpg --import"
{FE6F2AFD : 88D8 0D23 8D4B 3407 5BD7  66F9 2043 D0E5 FE6F 2AFD}

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to