Buchan Milne kirjoitti viestiss��n (l�hetysaika Keskiviikko 15 Lokakuu 2003 18:26): > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Pierre Jarillon wrote: > > BitTorrent is very slow, 50h is too much for my ADSL 512k/128k. > > <disclaimer excuse="insufficient bandwidth to play with bittorrent"> > > And what happened on the release of 9.1? Could you even get into a > mirror in the first few days? > > > I have limited max_upload at 11k and download is still low ~10k > > Without this limitation, DL=3k and UL=16k > > > > During the test, it works at 55k ! > > BitTorrent needs to be upgraded. 800M in exactly 24h is not a > > performance. > > Many users reported excellent speeds for the ISOs, just go read the > comments in MandrakeClub (sure, some people didn't get such speeds, and > some compained in the beginning but it improved). > > BTW, it looks from http://torrent.mandrakesoft.com:6969/ that at least > 2658 users have complete sets of ISOs (and it seems the torrent was > changed now to be one per CD-set instead of one per ISO?). 2658*2.1GB is > a *lot* of data ... there's no way Mandrake would be able to pay that > (assuming all the users who currently have the full set had used FTP > from a Club-only FTP server). > Yeah, and if everyone would keep their torrent running *after* they have downloaded the ISOs to spread the load... it would be even easier/faster for people...
I for sure will keep my torrent running until the Download ISOs hits the ftp mirrors... > > Where is the md5sum for this distro ? > > Apparently not needed with Bittorrent, though Danny has posted his in > the Club (in the comments on the current story). > </disclaimer> > -- Regards Thomas
