On Thursday 23 October 2003 02:46, Brad Felmey wrote: > On Wed, 2003-10-22 at 20:03, Galileo wrote: > > Another proof that Mandrake releases unfinished products. > > http://www.mandrakesecure.net/en/advisories/advisory.php?name=MDKA-2003:0 > >20 More that 250 MB of updates excluding SRPMS. How the hell did this > > happen ? > > It looks like x.2 doesn't mean a thing anymore. 7.2 and 8.2 were > > perfect. Why isn't so with 9.2 ? > > You, my fine feathered friend, are full of foo. > > 7.2 and 8.2 were decent, but not perfect. 9.2 even needing the updates > is a heck of a lot better than either 7.2 or 8.2. I know - I've used > every Mandrake since 5/6 and run cooker since 7.1. >
The real issue is the quantity of updates required so soon after release. > They could always be like SuSE or RedHat and consider non-security > bugfixes and updates to be next point release. Mandrake is bending over > backwards. Schedules have to be kept, but they didn't quit working when > it was cut - they kept at it to make a good product even better. > > Why on earth are you complaining, then? -- John Allen, Email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] MandrakeClub Silver Member.
