On Mon, 3 Nov 2003, G�tz Waschk wrote: > Am Montag, 3. November 2003, 11:04:53 Uhr MET, schrieb Eric Fernandez: > > Danny, I have open a club request for these drivers > > http://www.mandrakeclub.com/modules.php?op=modload&name=RPM&func=info_page&RID=1611 > > Maybe you could link them to the entry ? > > BTW, maybe that would be necessary to rename the patch name to "mdk" to > > uniformise, if Gotz doesn't mind ? > > You mean rename the release suffix from gpw to mdk? BTW I don't like > that the club packages have the mdk suffix, as they could be mixed up > with official packages. Couldn't this be changed to something else? perhaps, would need discussion on club-volunteers. Everyone has to do it, and the scripts have to parse everything correctly. Given the amount of time/money that is currently going to club infrastructure I wouldn't bet on this.
I did start naming everyting <version>.92mdk to distinguish them from cooker stuff (like we are doing for security updates now). I would to raise another point here quickly, but it needs its own thread: shouldn't we force release specific rpms? Too many people are using cooker rpms on stable version. Too many people are using rpms for different versions on their stable version. Can't urpmi complain about this? Perhaps not for noarch rpms, but certainly for binary stuff it would be nice. It probably would require each package to get a release tag. d. > >
